Mainly For Brummies But All Are Welcome To Join In The Birmingham Fun & Chat


RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#346 by phil ( deleted ) , Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:57 pm

Lyn

1903 Kelly Directory 134 Bromsgrove Street, Rose & Crown PH Edward Wade Edge Landlord.

Attached pictures:
You do not have the necessary rights to view attached pictures
phil

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#347 by phil ( deleted ) , Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:56 pm

Winkle

I can do you, The Red Lion Church St, The Hen & Chickens New St, The Woolpack Moor St, The Greyhound Navigation St. I can't swear that these were the pubs that the book refers to, but they certainly look old enough.

Attached pictures:
You do not have the necessary rights to view attached pictures
phil

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#348 by winkle , Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:10 am

Quote: phil wrote in post #347
Winkle

I can do you, The Red Lion Church St, The Hen & Chickens New St, The Woolpack Moor St, The Greyhound Navigation St. I can't swear that these were the pubs that the book refers to, but they certainly look old enough.


Cheers Mate. More later...

winkle  
winkle
Posts: 98
Date registered 02.22.2011


RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#349 by winkle , Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:02 pm

Anyone know the location of this photo? If so, the pub with Big Lamps on the extreme left at top of Street will become apparent...?

Bild entfernt (keine Rechte)

winkle  
winkle
Posts: 98
Date registered 02.22.2011


RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#350 by astoness , Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:09 pm

great pic winkle but ive no idea of the location..

lyn


 
astoness

Granny
Founder Member
Posts: 14.851
Date registered 02.24.2010


RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#351 by phil ( deleted ) , Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:52 pm

Winkle

I have no idea, but because of the name Sheffield Co Ltd and their connection with the poster & hoarding trade I will say Barwick St, but that doesn't help me any with a pub.

phil

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#352 by mikejee , Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:56 pm

I was thinking exactly the same as Phil, an am lost for a pub that would be obvious in that location,

mikejee  
mikejee

Founder Member
Posts: 3.028
Date registered 12.26.2009


RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#353 by Voltman , Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:04 pm

It does say Barwick St on Sheffield's sign but does that mean this view is of Barwick Street?
Surely there would be no need to give the address of the head office if this is at said address.


http://www.npl.co.uk/
http://www.gutenberg.org/
http://brummiestalking.org.uk/

 
Voltman

Founder Member
Technical Administrator
Posts: 17.868
Date registered 02.24.2010

Last edited 09.19.2012 | Top

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#354 by phil ( deleted ) , Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:22 am

Volty

I think we all agree that this photo was not taken outside Sheffield head office in Barwick St, because quite obviously then the pub in the photo would have been on the corner would have been on the corner of Church St & Barwick St. The problem being there would have been a brand new extension to the Grand Hotel there at the time of this photo.

Mike has suggested elsewhere that it could have possibly been outside Sheffields other premises on Lower Priory, but there again the topography doesn't match, so unless they had other premises or the given dates are wrong I'm afraid it will remain a mystery for now.

phil

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#355 by Voltman , Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:50 pm

Can I ask what Sheffields did?
Their apparent premises in this photo appears to be no more than a gap or a yard between two buildings, yet there is a "To Let" notice over what may be an entrance.

Also, who would all those sandwich board men have been working for, if not directly for the business they were advertising, W M Clarke of Liverpool, then you would expect them to assemble outside the agency office.
There are a lot of photo's or pictures on the columns of the front entrance to the building in the foreground, there is also a nameplate. I can easily believe that I can see the name Sheffield on line one of this plate.

Another thing that strikes me in this photo is that the pub appears to be on a corner, yet it stands out from the building line on at least one elevation whilst what ought to be a road off to the right appears to be pedestrianised.

I think there is more than enough information In this photo to provide the location, we just have to be able to recognise and identify all the clues.


http://www.npl.co.uk/
http://www.gutenberg.org/
http://brummiestalking.org.uk/

 
Voltman

Founder Member
Technical Administrator
Posts: 17.868
Date registered 02.24.2010

Last edited 09.24.2012 | Top

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#356 by Voltman , Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:22 am

A closer look seems to show Sheffield's name at the bottom of the sandwich boards.

The photo also appears here.... http://www.urban75.org/london/billboards.html


http://www.npl.co.uk/
http://www.gutenberg.org/
http://brummiestalking.org.uk/

 
Voltman

Founder Member
Technical Administrator
Posts: 17.868
Date registered 02.24.2010


RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#357 by phil ( deleted ) , Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:12 am

Volty

Yes I think most of us had spied that, and I also remember one time being paid some small amount to allow the company erect hoardings on our depot for advertising posters. We were more interested in the security aspect as they made a great high fence,

phil

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#358 by mikejee , Mon Sep 24, 2012 1:08 pm

Sheffield's was probably the very early predecessor of advertising agencies. William Lemon (!) Sheffield is listed in 1880 as a shirt & collar maker in Pinfold St, but by 1890 he is also listed as a bill poster. By 1893 his posting business is listed in Kelly’s as being run by Mrs Mary Ann Sheffield, while he still has his shirt & collar business, and is also a hatter & hosier at 83 New St. However in a case reported in the Bir, Post 21.2.1893 the firm is described as Sheffield’s Ltd, advertising contractors, and William appears in court as the managing director. Here they are suing a competitor for £2 for illegal posting on one of their sites. By the beginning of WW1 there is also a branch in Orphanage Road, Erdington, and by 1921 branches, in Hockley, Bournbrook, Smethwick & Coventry road.
By 1932 their head office is Publicity House, Cornwall St. by 1962 they have concentrated their operations to Publicity house and describe themselves as poster advertising contractors. This lasts till 1968 when they are either taken over or change their name to London Provincial Poster Group


mikejee  
mikejee

Founder Member
Posts: 3.028
Date registered 12.26.2009

Last edited 09.24.2012 | Top

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#359 by phil ( deleted ) , Mon Sep 24, 2012 1:16 pm

Mike

Did they still retain the name Sheffield after being taken over, because I'm sure it was those who we dealt with in the late 60's.

phil

RE: BIRMINGHAM PUBS as is and was

#360 by mikejee , Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:09 pm

Sorry Phil. I have just realised i misstyped. The date of takeover should have been 1968. could you change that on the post so it does noy confuse anyone ?

mikejee  
mikejee

Founder Member
Posts: 3.028
Date registered 12.26.2009


   

A Success Story
Good News For A Pint Or Two

Thank you for visiting our humble forum, make this your forum by joining us and posting your own thoughts and questions.
Xobor Create your own Forum with Xobor