In Agreement

For once agree with Osborne on this one
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22025035

I haven't seen a paper or heard the news today, but from what I have just read I think that 30 months per young life is disgusting. The judge could have given him more.

As for Osborne's rant on their lifestyle, typical to use the ones that abuse the system to curtail it for everyone. Everytime the system is changed it is always the genuine ones that end up paying, because the trash we are talking about know the system too well to loose out.

Osbourne is an opportunist and his ideas are aimed at giving money to his dubious friends. BUT I do feel that there should be no support for men , or women, to have more than three (at most) children if they cannot support them themselves.

Mike

Haven't they already made provision for this by stating that no more money will be available to single parents who have over two children. As the law in this country doesn't recognise polygamy one of his partners would be classed as single.

Phil
I didn't know that was included, though I had heard it suggested earlier. As you say, that would solev that one. All that remains now is my wish for politicians not to be able to produce any more of their kind - though I doubt if they would agree to voting for sterilization on election!!

Mike

I don't know if it has been put into operation yet, but it has been kicked about a bit.